Wednesday, April 2, 2014

I had walked into that reading-room a happy, healthy man. I crawled out a decrepit wreck.

(HT: 22Words)
This illustration reminded me of this account from one of my favourite books, Three Men in a Boat (to say nothing of the Dog), a great book which is available for free for Kindle, from Amazon


THERE were four of us - George, and William Samuel Harris, and myself, and Montmorency. We were sitting in my room, smoking, and talking about how bad we were - bad from a medical point of view I mean, of course.

We were all feeling seedy, and we were getting quite nervous about it. Harris said he felt such extraordinary fits of giddiness come over him at times, that he hardly knew what he was doing; and then George said that HE had fits of giddiness too, and hardly knew what HE was doing. With me, it was my liver that was out of order. I knew it was my liver that was out of order, because I had just been reading a patent liver-pill circular, in which were detailed the various symptoms by which a man could tell when his liver was out of order. I had them all.

It is a most extraordinary thing, but I never read a patent medicine advertisement without being impelled to the conclusion that I am suffering from the particular disease therein dealt with in its most virulent form. The diagnosis seems in every case to correspond exactly with all the sensations that I have ever felt.

I remember going to the British Museum one day to read up the treatment for some slight ailment of which I had a touch - hay fever, I fancy it was. I got down the book, and read all I came to read; and then, in an unthinking moment, I idly turned the leaves, and began to indolently study diseases, generally. I forget which was the first distemper I plunged into - some fearful, devastating scourge, I know - and, before I had glanced half down the list of "premonitory symptoms," it was borne in upon me that I had fairly got it.

I sat for awhile, frozen with horror; and then, in the listlessness of despair, I again turned over the pages. I came to typhoid fever - read the symptoms - discovered that I had typhoid fever, must have had it for months without knowing it - wondered what else I had got; turned up St. Vitus's Dance - found, as I expected, that I had that too, - began to get interested in my case, and determined to sift it to the bottom, and so started alphabetically - read up ague, and learnt that I was sickening for it, and that the acute stage would commence in about another fortnight. Bright's disease, I was relieved to find, I had only in a modified form, and, so far as that was concerned, I might live for years. Cholera I had, with severe complications; and diphtheria I seemed to have been born with. I plodded conscientiously through the twenty-six letters, and the only malady I could conclude I had not got was housemaid's knee.

I felt rather hurt about this at first; it seemed somehow to be a sort of slight. Why hadn't I got housemaid's knee? Why this invidious reservation? After a while, however, less grasping feelings prevailed. I reflected that I had every other known malady in the pharmacology, and I grew less selfish, and determined to do without housemaid's knee. Gout, in its most malignant stage, it would appear, had seized me without my being aware of it; and zymosis I had evidently been suffering with from boyhood. There were no more diseases after zymosis, so I concluded there was nothing else the matter with me.

I sat and pondered. I thought what an interesting case I must be from a medical point of view, what an acquisition I should be to a class! Students would have no need to "walk the hospitals," if they had me. I was a hospital in myself. All they need do would be to walk round me, and, after that, take their diploma.

Then I wondered how long I had to live. I tried to examine myself. I felt my pulse. I could not at first feel any pulse at all. Then, all of a sudden, it seemed to start off. I pulled out my watch and timed it. I made it a hundred and forty-seven to the minute. I tried to feel my heart. I could not feel my heart. It had stopped beating. I have since been induced to come to the opinion that it must have been there all the time, and must have been beating, but I cannot account for it. I patted myself all over my front, from what I call my waist up to my head, and I went a bit round each side, and a little way up the back. But I could not feel or hear anything. I tried to look at my tongue. I stuck it out as far as ever it would go, and I shut one eye, and tried to examine it with the other. I could only see the tip, and the only thing that I could gain from that was to feel more certain than before that I had scarlet fever.

I had walked into that reading-room a happy, healthy man. I crawled out a decrepit wreck.

Tuesday, April 1, 2014

'Snatching them out of the fire.....'

Graphic footage of the rescue of a construction worker trapped on the fifth floor of a building on fire.


I was reminded of Jude 22-23: And have mercy on some, who are doubting; save others, snatching them out of the fire; and on some have mercy with fear, hating even the garment polluted by the flesh.

Friday, March 28, 2014

"Too busy on the tasks of Yesterday..."

There is no lack of ideas in any organization I know. “Creativity” is not our problem. But few organizations ever get going on their own good ideas. Everybody is much too busy on the tasks of yesterday….

The need to slough off the outworn old to make possible the productive new is universal. It is reasonably certain that we would still have stagecoaches — nationalized, to be sure, heavily subsided, and with a fantastic research program to “retrain the horse” — had there been ministries of transportation around 1825.

Peter Drucker

(via Matt Perman)

Wednesday, March 26, 2014

World Vision's (and our) ethical dilemma

(Update: World Vision has since reversed its decision, and pledged to be more consultative in future decision making. However, to my mind, the same ethical decisions remain to be answered, especially if we are going to be working in Christian church or parachurch organisations.)

Here's another evolving situation, that brings out a number of ethical dilemmas. 

I wonder if all of you are following the recent storm that has erupted following World Vision USA's decision to permit employees to enter into legal same sex marriages, as long as they remain faithful to one partner. They continue to insist that all employees be 'followers of Jesus'. (In a nutshell, they believe it is consistent to assume that some followers of Jesus might be living in same-sex marriages). 

For those of you who have been missing the storm on the internet over the last few days, here is a brief round-up of some interesting stuff:

1. Christianity Today's initial announcement

2. Angry/grieved initial responses from evangelicals like John Piper (called World Vision: Adultery No, Homosexual Practice Yes), Denny Burk (called The Collapse of Christianity at World Vision) and Trevin Wax (called World Vision and Why We Grieve For the Children)

Some writers began to suggest that evangelicals begin to withdraw financial support to World Vision.

3. Here's a good article (No Neutral Ground for World Vision) giving some background explaining how World Vision was faced with an ethical dilemma, and how they took this decision wanting to stay neutral, but have actually ended up making a bad decision.

4. A hard hitting article from Rachel Held Evans lashing out at the evangelical response, and asking people to remember the good work World Vision is doing and continue to support them. 

So here are my questions:
1. What do you think of World Vision's decision? Can a Christian organisation (such as a mission hospital, Christian school, or church or para-church organisation) in this day and age continue to make rules about the personal lives of its staff, and expect them to live in a particular lifestyle? What sort of lifestyles would disqualify people from working at such organisations?

2. How should Christians respond? Should we stop helping children and communities which were benefiting from our support, by deciding to stop financing these organisations? Does the good work these organisations accomplish merit ignoring some bad decisions they make?

Saturday, December 7, 2013

What is a 'Christian' Song? What is a 'Christian' Band

From ctk Blog
Lead singer Jon Foreman was asked if Switchfoot is a “Christian” band. His response is worth pondering.

Switchfoot is going secular. Sort of.
Switchfoot is going secular. Sort of.

“To be honest, this question grieves me because I feel that it represents a much bigger issue than simply a couple SF tunes. In true Socratic form, let me ask you a few questions: Does Lewis or Tolkien mention Christ in any of their fictional series? Are Bach’s sonata’s Christian? What is more Christ-like, feeding the poor, making furniture, cleaning bathrooms, or painting a sunset? There is a schism between the sacred and the secular in all of our modern minds.

The view that a pastor is more ‘Christian’ than a girls volleyball coach is flawed and heretical. The stance that a worship leader is more spiritual than a janitor is condescending and flawed. These different callings and purposes further demonstrate God’s sovereignty.

Many songs are worthy of being written. Switchfoot will write some, Keith Green, Bach, and perhaps yourself have written others. Some of these songs are about redemption, others about the sunrise, others about nothing in particular: written for the simple joy of music.

None of these songs has been born again, and to that end there is no such thing as Christian music. No. Christ didn’t come and die for my songs, he came for me. Yes. My songs are a part of my life. But judging from scripture I can only conclude that our God is much more interested in how I treat the poor and the broken and the hungry than the personal pronouns I use when I sing. I am a believer. Many of these songs talk about this belief. An obligation to say this or do that does not sound like the glorious freedom that Christ died to afford me.

I do have an obligation, however, a debt that cannot be settled by my lyrical decisions. My life will be judged by my obedience, not my ability to confine my lyrics to this box or that.

We all have a different calling; Switchfoot is trying to be obedient to who we are called to be. We’re not trying to be Audio A or U2 or POD or Bach: we’re trying to be Switchfoot. You see, a song that has the words: ‘Jesus Christ’ is no more or less ‘Christian’ than an instrumental piece. (I’ve heard lots of people say Jesus Christ and they weren’t talking about their redeemer.) You see, Jesus didn’t die for any of my tunes. So there is no hierarchy of life or songs or occupation only obedience. We have a call to take up our cross and follow. We can be sure that these roads will be different for all of us. Just as you have one body and every part has a different function, so in Christ we who are many form one body and each of us belongs to all the others. Please be slow to judge ‘brothers’ who have a different calling.”

(HT:Z) 

Friday, December 6, 2013

Some more wisdom on Money and Giving from JD Greear

JD Greear has written another great article on Money: 3 Critical Truths about Our Money

1. Money problems usually come from money idolatry
2. Only an experience with the gospel changes our heart’s attitude toward money
3. People who ask, “How much do I have to give?” don’t get it

I am often asked how much Christians should give. Some who ask this are looking for wisdom, but many are looking for an out. They want to know how much is enough to get God off their backs, to fulfill their duty. And that attitude is miles away from the gospel.

Gospel giving is about love, not law. It’s not about percentages, but about a person. Zacchaeus throws out some numbers, but not because Jesus gives him the benchmark first. He does it out of sheer joy, as a love offering to God.

A lot of people who ask, “How much do I have to give?” labor under the delusion that God needs their money. In their minds, God is like the government, endlessly low on funds and constantly seeking more funding. But God doesn’t need our cash.

That’s why 2 Corinthians 9:7 says that God loves a cheerful giver. If God had needs, he wouldn’t care why you gave; he would only care that you gave. I’ve never gotten a letter from the IRS saying, “Yes, you paid the legal amount, but we sense that it wasn’t joyful giving. We’re concerned about your motives.” No, the IRS needs money, so that’s their bottom line.

But (thankfully) God isn’t like the IRS. God loves cheerful giving because gospel giving is primarily about worship and joy, not meeting needs. I have heard it said that God measures our generosity not by the size of our gifts, but by the size of our sacrifice, because sacrifice expresses the affections of our heart to God.

And if we find ourselves growing stingy and fearful once again, the answer is not to try harder. The answer is to look back at the cross, where God was lavishly generous with us. Because those people who truly experience the gospel become like the gospel—overflowing with grace.

Read the whole article

(HT:Z)

Possibly Related Posts from the Past

1. Some thoughts on Giving (and the Tithe)
2. God's way of making us a part of His Kingdom
3. Sacrificial Giving

Thursday, December 5, 2013

Kobe Bryant and Michael Jordan side by side

It's quite uncanny to see the similarities between the two greats when their moves on court are placed side by side...




(HT:Z)

Angels We Have Heard On High

The PianoGuys produce another masterpiece!



Possibly Related Posts from the Past

1. "What makes you Beautiful"

Saturday, November 30, 2013

Famous Splits

Check out these videos from the inimitable 22Words

Exhibit 1: Jean-Claude Van Damme performs a famous split between two Volvo trucks in an advertisement for its dynamic steering


Exhibit 2: Turns out Ajay Devgan had done something very similar in his Bollywood debut Phool Aur Kaante many years ago....




I'm feeling sick just thinking about this!